Brown Family Law Dives Headfirst Into Social Media

Exposing readers to our family practice has been pretty exciting around here lately. Over the last several months we’ve taken the plunge, head-first, into social media. “Studio B” has been constructed (literally).

With two web sites, a blog, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn and podcasts, we finally feel like we have the outlets necessary to serve a distinct group of information-seekers.

If you want to read about our firm, you can visit our web site. If you want in-depth articles…well…you’ve found our blog. If you want to to take audio with you for the bus ride into work, download our podcast programs. If you’re another family law professional, let’s talk shop.

Our goal is simply to provide current clients, potential clients, media sources and other family law professionals with timely, useful information on divorce and family law issues, and to interact in a meaningful way:

As always, the simplest way to get to know us is through an e-mail or phone call. Click on the banner to the right for a re-direct to our web site.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail this to someoneDigg thisShare on RedditShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon

Divorce Lawyers Encouraged To Gather Evidence From Social Networking Sites Such As Facebook, Twitter And MySpace

Minnesota Lawyer recently featured an article by Sylvia Hseih entitled Divorce Attorneys are Missing Evidence on Social Media Sites. She reports that sites such as Facebook and Twitter contain a “treasure trove” of legal evidence- especially in divorce cases. She writes, however, that most lawyers are missing the boat.

Hseih points out that damaging messages and compelling photos can quickly lead a case to settlement if discovered and presented early.

Citing the “adultery discovery,” Hseih suggests that a suspicious spouse may be armed with damaging information to bring in to court. Keep in mind, however, that Minnesota is a no-fault divorce state. Whether you or your spouse are faithful to one another isn’t relevant under our divorce statutes (Hseih’s article first appeared in a national publication).

There are other highly relevant uses for this information, however. Here are a few examples referenced by Hseih:

  • Confessions involving an individuals social life;
  • Photos with children in places they ought not be;
  • Photos of parties to the case consuming liquor or using drugs;
  • Income and employment information; or
  • Inappropriate sexual content

Hseih recommends looking both ways, urging lawyers to speak with their clients about the types of social networks they post on, limiting the information they provide and increasing access security to prevent their spouse from tapping in.

I encourage anyone going through a divorce to modify all of their passwords to prevent a spouse from creating a false profile or modifying information on the social sites in an attempt to cast  you in a negative light. It wasn’t that long ago that a client pulled up her MySpace page to find that she was already “single” and a “swinger.” Of course, her husband denied making those changes and tried to hold it against her in court. Wasn’t successful, but I guess he deserves an “A” for creativity – not to mention fabricating evidence.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail this to someoneDigg thisShare on RedditShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon