<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Grandparent Rights - Minnesota Divorce &amp; Family Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/articles/custody/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:58:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:05:38 -0600</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Firm Obtains Generous Grandparenting Time Award</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="1" alt="" align="left" width="210" height="138" src="http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/uploads/image/grnad.jpg" />Our attorneys were recently involved in a very contentious family law situation involving a request for <strong>grandparenting time</strong>. Our firm represented the paternal grandparents of two children, ages 9 and 5. The mother and father of these two boys both contested the request of the grandparents for a court order that would compel grandparent visitation.</p>
<p>Our argument to the court was that the grandparents had &ldquo;stepped into the shoes&rdquo; of the father, who was an admitted alcoholic. Despite the fact that the grandparents had spent substantial amounts of time with their grandkids, mom and dad disputed their continued involvement in the lives of the children and wanted all time spent with the grandparents to be supervised. <br />
<br />
Our clients were awarded one full weekend a month with the grandkids and additional time to take their grandchildren on vacation. None of the time was required to be supervised. This award was quite substantial, given the fact that most non-custodial parents are typically ordered to receive two weekends per month of parenting time, along with one weekday evening. The court clearly recognized that the <strong>stability of the children was critical in this case</strong> and that this ongoing relationship served their best interests.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/2008/05/articles/custody/firm-obtains-generous-grandparenting-time-award/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/2008/05/articles/custody/firm-obtains-generous-grandparenting-time-award/</guid>
<category>Custody</category><category>Grandparent Rights</category><category>Grandparenting Time</category><category>Parenting Time</category><category>Paternity</category><category>Third Party Custody</category><category>Visitation</category><category>Wright County</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:58:26 -0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Brown</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>The Concept of No-Fault Divorce</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="1" alt="" align="left" width="220" height="146" src="http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/uploads/image/nof.jpg" />Minnesota is a <strong>no-fault divorce state</strong>. A divorce will be granted in Minnesota without the necessity of proving that one of the parties is guilty of marital misconduct. In earlier times, a party to a divorce was required to demonstrate that the other spouse was at fault for causing a breakdown in the marriage. Adultory was by far the most common basis, but others included domestic abuse, abandonment and an inability to consumate the marriage.</p>
<p>Today, a party to a divorce in Minnesota must merely demonstrate that there has been an <strong>&quot;irretrievable breakdown&quot; in the marital relationship</strong>. One spouse must simply acknowledge as much, and&nbsp;the court will grant their request to dissolve the marriage. A relatively low threshold - and a tough pill to swallow for those who feel that there is no &quot;justice&quot; in their case unless the court takes into account marital misconduct.</p>
<p>Potential clients often ask, &quot;Should I fight the divorce?&quot; Yes, if you intend to do so outside of the legal arena through counseling or therapy. Once it is obvious that the marriage cannot be saved, your resistence should be limited to that which is necessary to obtain a favorable court order. Not wanting the divorce can be used as leverage against your spouse if they are anxious to conclude matters. Often, the impatient spouse will buy a quick resolution by making an extremely attractive settlement offer. This strategy should be balanced against overdoing it. If you are fighting the dissolution process out of anger or spite, you are likely to cause significant economic and emotional harm to you, your spouse and your children.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/2008/02/articles/nofault-divorce/the-concept-of-nofault-divorce/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/2008/02/articles/nofault-divorce/the-concept-of-nofault-divorce/</guid>
<category>Alimony</category><category>Alternative Dispute Resolution</category><category>Appeals</category><category>Arbitration</category><category>Business Interests</category><category>Case Management Conferences</category><category>Child Support</category><category>Cohabitation</category><category>Collaborative Divorce</category><category>Common Law Marriage</category><category>Contempt</category><category>Contested Divorce</category><category>Custody</category><category>Custody Evaluations</category><category>Debt Division</category><category>Discovery</category><category>Domestic Abuse</category><category>Early Neutral Evaluation</category><category>Experts</category><category>Fees &amp; Costs</category><category>Grandparent Rights</category><category>Harassment Restraining Orders</category><category>High Conflict Cases</category><category>Mediation</category><category>No-Fault Divorce</category><category>Orders for Protection</category><category>Out of State Moves</category><category>Parenting Time</category><category>Parenting Time Consultants</category><category>Parenting Time Expeditors</category><category>Paternity</category><category>Podcasts</category><category>Post-Decree Motions</category><category>Postnuptial Agreements</category><category>Pre-Trial Conferences</category><category>Prenuptial Agreements</category><category>Property Division</category><category>Retirement Interests</category><category>Step-Parent Adoption</category><category>Tax Implications</category><category>Temporary Motions</category><category>Termination of Parental Rights</category><category>Third Party Custody</category><category>Trials</category><category>Uncontested Divorce</category><category>Visitation</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:08:24 -0600</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Brown</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
