Recent Shortage of Minnesota Appellate Decisions; Pilot Mediation Program Likely Cause

For the second time in as many weeks, no family law decisions issued by the Minnesota Court of Appeals or Minnesota Supreme Court. The likely culprit? A new pilot appellate mediation program aimed specifically at family law cases. My guess is the former flood of appellate opinions is being limited by the settlement of cases.

The pilot program, which began 18 months ago, is designed, according to the State, "with the goal of decreasing the conflict levels for families, decreasing the costs to litigants and the court, and increasing efficiency and litigation satisfaction."  The process is structured to reinforce and work cooperatively with the early-neutral-evaluation and other alternative-dispute processes that are become more common at the district court level.

Referral to mediation takes place after the appellant's Statement of the Case has been filed and the filing fee has been paid, but occurs before the briefing stage and before litigants incur the substantial costs of ordering transcripts from the district court where the case originated. Good news; parties to an appeal can expect to spend no less than $10,000.00 each to get through the process.

About a week ago I received a Notice of Appeal from an opposing litigant. Thus far, the Court of Appeals has stayed the proceeding (did so almost immediately) and ordered the parties to mediate within 90 days. The parties are able to rank  five highly qualified mediators appearing on the Court's roster of approved neutrals. The combined blind rank of each party will determine who will serve as the neutral. A sliding fee scale has been implemented, to facilitate various income and net worth levels.

I've heard nothing but good things about the program. I'll update the process as I work my way through it for the first time.

Child Custody, Child Support and Property Division on the Mind of the Minnesota Court of Appeals

The Minnesota Court of Appeals recently rendered three family law decisions, none of which warranted publication. One case involved child support issues, another custody and child support and the third property valuation and division:

  • Donovan v. Donovan: Minnesota Court of Appeals (Unpublished). Judge Shumaker held that a child support bonus provision was unambiguous and that the doctrine of laches is inapplicable to child support cases.
  • Adler v. Espinosa: Minnesota Court of Appeals (Unpublished). Judge Lansing opined that the district court appropriately determined physical custody and child support obligation.
  • McCormick v. McCormick: Minnesota Court of Appeals (Unpublished)  Judge Halbrooks found no error in district court's valuation of real estate and denial of fee award, but reversed district court's award of 100% of the marital equity in the homestead to wife.

Minnesota Divorce Lawyers: 10 Signs You've Hired a Bad One

Hats off to Chicago Divorce Lawyer Marie Fahnert. She recently posted an article entitled 10 Signs of a Bad Divorce Lawyer on her Divorce Blog. What should you avoid in a Minnesota Divorce Lawyer? According to Fahnert, you should avoid a family lawyer who:

  1. Empathizes too much with your pain. If you have a stomach ache, you don’t want the doctor seeing you identifying with your pain. You want the doctor to be objective and fix your ailment. Same thing goes for lawyers.
  2. Doesn't listen to you. A good lawyer should have a good understanding of your personality, desires and wishes. This can only be achieved through empathetic listening.
  3. Promises to avenge. Laws are set up to help both divorcing parties establish themselves after a divorce. There is no place in a divorce courtroom for vengeance. Your lawyer should tell you this.
  4. Calls your spouse names. It is common - although not recommended - for divorcing couples to call each other names. It is unacceptable, however, for a lawyer to engage in this kind of conduct. Your lawyer should be seeking to help you view your situation objectively. Name-calling is never objective.
  5. Uses inflammatory language. Over the top language does not help resolve conflict. It won’t help you reach a fair outcome in your case. It only makes things worse. When used by a lawyer, inflammatory language also shows a lack of professionalism.
  6. Excessively criticizes other lawyers. In ideal divorces there is a lot of collaboration and trust between the opposing lawyers. A lawyer who cannot get along with other lawyers could wreak havoc on this balance. Also, these things are usually reciprocal - why don’t other lawyers like your lawyer?
  7. Tells you he’ll “take care” of the divorce for you. There is no divorce lawyer who can “take care” of your case while you sip a martini. Divorce is hard work for everyone involved. There are documents to produce, depositions to attend and court documents to review. Anyone who claims otherwise is not being honest.
  8. Predicts the future. Some parts of a case can be somewhat accurately predicted (child support, for example). Most outcomes are not so clear. In truth, outcomes are often a gamble. A lawyer who tells you they have all the answers may be full of hot air.
  9. Buys your blatant lies. Nobody likes a liar or a cheater. If your divorce lawyer overlooks your bad behavior it is not because they like you. They’ll drop you like a hot potato when you run out of cash.
  10. Does not express his views. It is a lawyer’s job to encourage clients to make the best decisions for their case. This is often in conflict with the path a client feels is best. A lawyer who does not make his views known might be doing you a great disservice. 

Great suggestions. I would add an additional criteria: Focuses on trial from the onset. As I share with each potential client, we are fully prepared to try their case if necessary. But, our initial focus remains on positioning the case for settlement. The best lawyers don't need their cases to go to trial; they have enough work to approach a conflict in a manner most favorable to their client's (not the firm's) bottom line.

Divorce Settlement Checklist: Answer These 24 Questions and You're Done!

We've posted a number of entries concerning the benefits of settling a divorce as opposed to litigation. Even if you need to litigate, more than 95% of cases will settle before trial.

The following settlement checklist will come in handy as you attempt to figure out if you've got all of your bases covered:

  1. Legal Custody: Joint or sole legal custody?
  2. Physical Custody: Joint or sole physical custody?
  3. Routine Access Schedule: Where will the children be on a given day?
  4. Vacation Access Schedule: How many weeks of uninterrupted vacation time with the children?
  5. Holiday Access Schedule: Who do the children celebrate with in a given year?
  6. School-Year Breaks: Where will the children spend spring break or President's Day, for example?
  7. Telephone Contact: What are the rules concerning communication with the children by phone?
  8. Transportation: Who will transport the children for parenting time exchanges?
  9. Basic Child Support: What is the amount of guideline support to be paid?
  10. Medical/Dental Child Support: Who will insure the children and how will uninsured costs be allocated?
  11. Child Care Support: How much will each parent pay for daycare?
  12. Security for Support: Should one or both parents secure life insurance, naming the other as beneficiary for the benefit of the children?
  13. Income Tax Exemptions: Who claims the children on their income taxes?
  14. Spousal Maintenance/Alimony: How much and for how long?
  15. Medical Insurance: Will each party cover their own?
  16. Marital Property: What is a fair and equitable way to value and divide marital property?
  17. Non-Marital Property: Does the holder of a non-marital interest retain that interest?
  18. Pre-Separation Debts: How is the marital debt divided?
  19. Post-Separation Debts: How are debts accrued after separation divided?
  20. Fees and Costs: Will one party pay, or each responsible for their own attorney fees and costs?
  21. Name Change: Does either spouse wish to change their name?
  22. Ongoing Conflicts: Will the parties agree to mediate or use a parenting time consultant if future problems arise?
  23. Documents: Do each agree to execute all paperwork necessary to transfer property interests?
  24. Non-Disclosure: Does the court retain the ability to re-open the case if it is revealed that one party has hidden assets from the other?

Naturally, there are many other issues that will need to be addressed, but the 24 items listed above will give you a general framework for discussion.

View From The Bench: Minnesota Family Law Judges Offer Suggestions To Litigants

The Minnesota Judicial Branch has published an exceptional brochure entitled "From the Judges of Family Court: What to Expect...Divorce in Minnesota." In reviewing, it appears to serve as a "reality check" for the litigants. Much of it I endorse. Here is some of what the Court has to say:

A divorce can be a painful and difficult experience, but if you understand the functions and limitations of the legal system, the process becomes less frustrating. It is our hope, as Judges of Family Court, that this pamphlet will give you a better understanding of the process, and help you get through your divorce with realistic ideas and goals.

Continue Reading...

How Much Will Divorce Cost Me?

We have the responsibility to tell every potential client that we “aren't sure.” Now...how's that for building credibility with someone who wants to entrust their life with you for a bit?

The truth is that we really don't know how much a divorce is going to cost in the end. An attorney who tells you they do probably isn't being up front with you. A host of issues beyond our control play a part in every case. Much depends on what county your case is filed in, what the mindset of the opposing attorney is, who the judge is in your case and what issues are contested.

Divorce cases tend to fall into one of two categories: contested and uncontested. Most contested cases become an uncontested case at some point. 
 

Continue Reading...

What to Expect During An Intitial Consultation

Although divorce is quite common in our society, we understand that you probably haven't been through it before.  Perhaps the most difficult decision in the entire divorce process is the one that you will make prior to contacting an attorney - the decision to dissolve your marriage.

Once you have determined this is the appropriate step for you to take, you may find yourself puzzled about where to turn. It is likely that you will speak with several attorneys to get a sense of the various approaches they may take in your case and to see if their personality is compatible with yours. At some point, you'll need to decide whether meeting with an attorney as part of an initial consultation is right for you.

We have the privilege of meeting with potential clients quite regularly. During our free initial consultation we try to gather some basic facts about your situation, provide some guidance as to the options that you may face, what the costs and timeframes are with each option and answer any questions you may have about the divorce process, our qualifications to handle the case and our opinion about the merits of your situation. Of importance, we determine together whether it is most appropriate to treat your case as a contested matter or an uncontested dissolution. 

A typical consultation lasts approximately 30 minutes and takes place in our office or over the telephone.  All information shared within the consultation remains strictly confidential and cannot be shared with anyone.

Toward the end of the consultation, we try to get a sense of where you are at with things.  Many of the folks we meet with are just trying to get a broad perspective on what is to come, while others are ready to proceed with the action itself. We are not here to put pressure on anybody. However, if a potential potential client is ready to retain the services of our firm, we provide them with an in-depth client questionnaire to complete and return to us at their convenience.  This allows us to have the key information necessary to properly represent them as we move forward.

Recovery of Fees and Costs

There are two ways for litigants recover attorney's fees from the other party in a Minnesota divorce. The first involves need-based fees. The second involves fees awarded because of inappropriate behavior ("bad-faith conduct") on the part of the other party.

For a fee request based on need, the court is required to award fees and costs in order to enable a party to carry on or contest the dissolution if it finds that the fees are necessary for a good-faith assertion of the party's rights, the fees sought will not contribute unnecessarily to the length and expense of the preceding, the party from whom fees are sought has the ability to pay them, and the party seeking fees does not have the ability to pay them.

A fee award may also be made based upon bad-faith conduct. The fee award will likely be based upon the fact that one party unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the preceding.  This generally means that a litigant must go above and beyond the norm of advocacy in terms of proceeding with their case. The mere fact they are contesting issues and requesting a trial does not necessarily mean that have engaged in "unreasonable" conduct.