Minneapolis Divorce Attorney & Lawyer : Minnesota Family Law Firm : Brown Law Offices : St. Paul, Twin Cities MN

Once an award of spousal maintenance (alimony) is ordered by the court, it may be modified if certain criteria are met. In order to modify and award of alimony, the party seeking modification obtains a court date and serves and files motion papers. Keep in mind that the modification, if granted, is usually only retroactive to the date that the motion papers are served on the other side. For that reason, it is important to obtain legal assistance at the earliest possible time, rather than allowing arrears to build up, if you are unable to afford the maintenance obligation as ordered.

Any of the following provide a basis for the judge to modify an existing alimony order:

• Substantially increased or decreased earnings of either party;
• Substantially increased or decreased needs of either party;
• Receipt of public assistance benefits;
• Change in cost of living, as measured by the federal government; and
• Significant medical expenses incurred on behalf of a child that are not otherwise addressed in the judgment and decree.

Additional factors for consideration include the initial standards the court addresses in awarding spousal maintenance:

• Financial need of each party relative to their income;
• The ability of one party to pay the other spousal support;
• The length of marriage;
• The mental and physical health of the parties;
• The role each party played during the marriage, in terms of working or raising children;
• Financial assets available to each party to supplement their income;
• The educational background of each party; and
• The age of each party.

While the issues involved in modifying spousal maintenance are usually addressed in motion papers alone (such as affidavits and exhibits), some judges will order an evidentiary hearing (trial) to determine whether the request for modification is appropriate.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Spousal maintenance, formerly known as alimony, is one of the more difficult issues to tackle during the dissolution process.  With the exception of child custody, no other issue is as personal or emotionally charged to divorce litigants.

It is quite difficult to predict exactly how much spousal maintenance the court will award a particular party.  The court will examine a host of factors, and each play a part in the decision-making process.  For that reason, alimony is decided on a case-by-case basis. 

The court will examine the standard of living established during the marriage.  Based upon that standard, it will take into account the anticipated ongoing monthly expenses of each spouse. The question for the court involves whether these alleged expenses are reasonable under the circumstances.  The court will compare the expenses against the income of each litigant.  If a litigant faces a monthly shortfall, the party will have a need for spousal support. If a litigant faces a monthly windfall, they will have the ability to pay spousal maintenance.  These elements are measured against the length of the parties' marriage, the age of the parties, the educational background of the parties and the mental and physical health of the parties.

Once all of the elements are considered, the court will determine whether an award is appropriate, how much the monthly award should be and the length of time paying party will be obligated to support their former spouse. The longer the marriage, the more likely a permanent award of spousal maintenance will be granted.  With shorter marriages, the court may consider an award of temporary spousal maintenance so that other party has an opportunity to reeducate themselves, reestablish their career path and become self-supporting.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In an opinion filed March 3, 2009, the Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a Dakota County District Court's reduction, not elimination, of husband's spousal maintenance obligation following retirement. Judge Halbrooks wrote, without dissent, in Wisness v. Wisness.

The Wisness' 30-year marriage was dissolved by a stipulated judgment and decree on September 17, 1993. The stipulated judgment and decree resolved the vast majority of the issues in their case, including alimony. As a result of the parties' agreement, husband was ordered to pay respondent $1,450 per month in permanent spousal maintenance.

Three years later, at age 56, husband had an opportunity to take early retirement from his employer. He moved the district court to terminate or reduce his spousal maintenance obligation. The retirement package that he was offered provided for a 50% reduction in income until he turned 62. The district court denied husband's motion, stating that while appellant could take advantage of the retirement opportunity, he could not avoid his obligation to pay support by voluntarily reducing his income. Despite that decision, husband opted for early retirement.

In 2007, then 67, husband moved the district court to eliminate his spousal maintenance obligation. He had remarried and was then working part-time as a school-bus driver, earning annual wages of $3,271 and $1,481 per month in social-security and Medicare payments. Despite a finding that husband retired in good faith, the district court declined to fully eliminate his alimony obligation:

It is fair and equitable to reduce [appellant’s] spousal maintenance obligation by approximately 50%, in light of both parties[’] present ability to meet their ongoing living expenses. Both parties will have to curtail their expenses or dip into their marital property to make up for the shortfall they each will sustain as a result of this modification of spousal maintenance.

Husband appealed. The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed, opining  that findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are "clearly erroneous." The court found that the district court considered the statutory factors of wife's financial resources relative to her ongoing expenses. Relying heavily on the "standard of living" element of Minnesota's maintenance statute, Judge Halbrooks determined that wife's projected rent, medication expenses and health insurance expenses were reasonable.

Husband argued that he should not have to pay spousal maintenance because his ongoing monthly expenses were $183 less than his monthly gross (pre-tax) income. However, the court affirmed that, despite the shortfall, a mere reduction (as opposed to elimination) was appropriate and that the district court gave weight to the fact that both parties will have to curtail expenses or dip into their marital property in order to satisfy their monthly expenses.

At the end of the day, Wisness makes it clear that a maintenance obligor who retires in good faith may still be obligated to pay spousal maintenance to their ex. The safe bet for an obligor who has agreed to pay permanent spousal maintenance? Establish a specific timetable for termination of the obligation, if possible.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has affirmed a substantial spousal maintenance award.

In McCarney v. Hartleben, Ms. McCarney was stay-at-home mother who had taken some courses in an effort to obtain a degree in psychology. Dr. Hartleben worked as a surgeon, earning a net monthly income of approximately $30,000 on gross income of $600,000 per year.

Judge Stauber, in an unpublished decision, opined that the trial court did not err in granting McCarney monthly spousal maintenance payments of $13,000 conditioned on a reduction to $8,000 per month when she obtained the certification necessary to work as a licensed psychologist. Judge Stauber noted:

Findings of fact concerning spousal maintenance must be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous. In order to successfully challenge a district court’s findings of fact, the party challenging the findings must show that despite viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings . . . the record still requires the definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made.

The court did reverse and remand an award of $800 per month to Ms. McCarney to pay her life insurance premiums.

As referenced in other posts on our blog, alimony awards are based upon several factors, including the length of marriage, the financial need of the spouse seeking maintenance (comparing their anticipated income against their reasonable monthly expenses) and the ability of the spouse being asked to pay alimony to make payments to their spouse. The reasonableness of the parties' budgets is based upon the standard of living the enjoyed during the marriage.

In this case, the court indicated that the parties lived a "lavish lifestyle" and had no difficulty accepting the wife's projected budget of $13,000 per month. Given the husband's substantial earnings and the length of the parties' marriage, the court required him to pay a rather significant figure each month.

The good news for husband? Alimony payments are tax deductible. Given his tax bracket, he'll probably only suffer an out-of-pocket loss of approximately fifty-percent of the payment made to his ex wife.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

We've posted a number of entries concerning the benefits of settling a divorce as opposed to litigation. Even if you need to litigate, more than 95% of cases will settle before trial.

The following settlement checklist will come in handy as you attempt to figure out if you've got all of your bases covered:

1. Legal Custody: Joint or sole legal custody?
2. Physical Custody: Joint or sole physical custody?
3. Routine Access Schedule: Where will the children be on a given day?
4. Vacation Access Schedule: How many weeks of uninterrupted vacation time with the children?
5. Holiday Access Schedule: Who do the children celebrate with in a given year?
6. School-Year Breaks: Where will the children spend spring break or President's Day, for example?
7. Telephone Contact: What are the rules concerning communication with the children by phone?
8. Transportation: Who will transport the children for parenting time exchanges?
9. Basic Child Support: What is the amount of guideline support to be paid?
10. Medical/Dental Child Support: Who will insure the children and how will uninsured costs be allocated?
11. Child Care Support: How much will each parent pay for daycare?
12. Security for Support: Should one or both parents secure life insurance, naming the other as beneficiary for the benefit of the children?
13. Income Tax Exemptions: Who claims the children on their income taxes?
14. Spousal Maintenance/Alimony: How much and for how long?
15. Medical Insurance: Will each party cover their own?
16. Marital Property: What is a fair and equitable way to value and divide marital property?
17. Non-Marital Property: Does the holder of a non-marital interest retain that interest?
18. Pre-Separation Debts: How is the marital debt divided?
19. Post-Separation Debts: How are debts accrued after separation divided?
20. Fees and Costs: Will one party pay, or each responsible for their own attorney fees and costs?
21. Name Change: Does either spouse wish to change their name?
22. Ongoing Conflicts: Will the parties agree to mediate or use a parenting time consultant if future problems arise?
23. Documents: Do each agree to execute all paperwork necessary to transfer property interests?
24. Non-Disclosure: Does the court retain the ability to re-open the case if it is revealed that one party has hidden assets from the other?

Naturally, there are many other issues that will need to be addressed, but the 24 items listed above will give you a general framework for discussion.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The court will "impute" income if your spouse is voluntarily underemployed. Rest assured, you have nothing to fear.

Let's suppose your spouse is trained as a physician and decides, for the time being, to work as a waiter at a local restaurant. The court can take an individual's education, work history, job opportunities in the local market and earnings associated with those jobs into account in calculating appropriate child or spousal support. Assuming your spouse is reasonably assured of obtaining a position as a doctor with a six-figure salary, a doctor's salary will be attributed to them.

One of the more common discussions we have with new clients involves a spouse's claim (with laughter) that they will quit their job and our client will receive nothing. "I'll quit my job" they say. Wrong strategy. Your spouse is free to work in whatever capacity they wish. At the end of the day, however, the amount of support they pay is based on what they actually earn or have the potential to earn, whichever is greater. 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Minnesota Judicial Branch has published an exceptional brochure entitled "From the Judges of Family Court: What to Expect...Divorce in Minnesota." In reviewing, it appears to serve as a "reality check" for the litigants. Much of it I endorse. Here is some of what the Court has to say:

A divorce can be a painful and difficult experience, but if you understand the functions and limitations of the legal system, the process becomes less frustrating. It is our hope, as Judges of Family Court, that this pamphlet will give you a better understanding of the process, and help you get through your divorce with realistic ideas and goals.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Depending upon the facts and legal issues involved in your divorce, a number of experts may play a role in your case, including a home appraiser, actuary, custody evaluator, business appraiser and vocational assessor.

The most common expert we employ is a home appraiser. In most cases the most valuable asset for division is the marital homestead. If one party elects to remain in the homestead we must calculate the equity in the house to determine the value of the property settlement. Naturally, the first step to establishing equity involves the determination of the market value of the property.

A typical homestead appraisal costs around $350. They take approximately one (1) week to complete. Many clients ask if a realtor’s market analysis can substitute for an appraisal. If the parties agree, a market analysis is sufficient. However, a realtor’s market analysis does not hold the same evidentiary weight as a certified real estate appraisal. For that reason, the appraisal is usually preferred.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link